Romm seem to be most pissed that since Dyson wasn’t a climate scientist he shouldn’t have been given any room to air his views and that the media needs to act as a “filter” to make sure we Lilliputians cant have our thought polluted with heretical ideas like Dyson’s.
It got better though:
“If he were a Holocaust denier or if he said cigarettes were good for you, thenI find it truly disgusting that Romm has the nerve to compare one of the most distinguished scientist of his generation to a holocaust denier.
Dawidoff would not be writing this favorable extensive profile of his life and
times”
“Scientists” like Joe Romm remind me of those who threw charges of heresy at Galileo Galilei. Fact is Dyson is eminently more credible than Romm on what does and does not constitute good science and scientific method and the unreliable nature of scientific theories when they are still in their infancy.
I doubt Romm would last more than 30 minuets in a face to face debate with Dyson, but a coward like Romm wouldn’t take that challenge in the first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment